🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are observing intently to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

European Movement

Across Europe, a increasing chorus of countries are considering similar measures.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our children's innocence". A law could be formalized next year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital wallet to verify the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "a potential options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has called on lawmakers to approve a bill increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has recommended guardians to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a advisory motion calling for a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is given. Although it warns of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a solid foundation," stated the MEP behind the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a future ban, emphasizing that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "supported by robust data".

Last year, support built behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately watered down. However, the administration vowed to investigate the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. One foundation established by the family of a teenager who took her own life after encountering dangerous social media material argues that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create products and services that are safe and suitable for children," said a influential child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Landscape

Stateside, action is primarily occurring at the local level amid national gridlock.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill banning children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a rule limiting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with any further time needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have also enacted laws mandating adult authorization for minors to set up social media profiles.

Despite widespread concern and calls from certain figures to mimic the Australian path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Beyond these regions, other countries are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, global agencies take a more measured stance. Unicef has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "may even backfire". The organization notes that the internet can be a "vital connection" for marginalized youth and that bans should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve user protection.

As this global conversation continues, the policies of the Australian government and others indicate that states around the world are increasingly willing to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.